• Home
  • Leadership Teams
  • Committees
    • ICC
    • UNDOC
    • UNSC
    • UNHRC
    • European Parliament
    • Model Arab League
    • General Assembly
    • G20
  • More
    • Home
    • Leadership Teams
    • Committees
      • ICC
      • UNDOC
      • UNSC
      • UNHRC
      • European Parliament
      • Model Arab League
      • General Assembly
      • G20
  • Home
  • Leadership Teams
  • Committees
    • ICC
    • UNDOC
    • UNSC
    • UNHRC
    • European Parliament
    • Model Arab League
    • General Assembly
    • G20

European Parliament Delegate Guide

Introduction

The European Parliament is the directly elected legislative assembly of the European Union, representing EU citizens and making laws alongside the Council of the European Union.  


Role of Delegates

As a delegate in the European Parliament you represent a Member State, UN agency, or accredited NGO. Your responsibilities before and during the conference include researching your country/organization’s human rights record and policies, preparing an opening speech, drafting and negotiating clauses for draft resolutions, lobbying for support, and participating actively in moderated/unmoderated caucuses.


Role of the Chairing Panel

The Chairing Panel (President, Vice-President(s), and Rapporteur/Directing Chair) enforces MMUN rules, manages the speakers' list, rules on points and motions, facilitates caucuses, assesses procedural motions, and assists delegates in drafting and submitting amendments. Chairs should be impartial, clear, and consistent in applying procedure.


General Conduct

• Diplomatic language and mutual respect are mandatory at all times. Personal attacks or discriminatory remarks are prohibited.

• Formal business attire is required during committee sessions.

• Electronic devices are allowed for research and note-taking only. Social media during sessions is discouraged.

• Delegates must accurately represent their assigned country/organization policy and interests.


Debate Procedure

Roll Call: The Chair conducts roll call at the start of each session. Delegations answer "Present" or "Present and Voting." "Present and Voting".

Setting the Agenda: If relevant, the committee may vote to select the order of topics using a simple majority. The agenda is often set in advance, but Chairs should clarify any session-specific rules at opening.

Speakers' List: The primary form of debate. Delegates raise placards to be added to the list; speeches should be substantive and focused on the agenda topic.


Caucuses

Moderated Caucus: Requested for focused, time-limited debate on a sub-issue. A motion must specify total time, speaking time per speaker, and a clear purpose. Requires a second and a simple majority.

Unmoderated Caucus: Informal negotiation time for delegates to draft resolutions and lobby. A motion must specify the total time. Requires a second and a simple majority (or Chair approval).


Points & Motions — Quick Reference

Points — Additional Notes

• Points must be raised and wait to be recognized by the Chair before being stated.
• A Point of Personal Privilege regarding audibility may interrupt the speaker; other points may not.
• A Point of Order must reference a specific recent procedural error to be in order.


Writing Resolutions & Working Papers

European parliament outputs are best framed as diplomatic, human-rights-focused draft resolutions or working papers. Resolutions should be inclusive, actionable, and grounded in human rights law.

Preambulatory Clauses:
Start with participles or descriptive phrases that recall background, legal instruments, or previous UN actions. Examples: 'Bearing in mind', 'Recalling', 'Recognizing', 'Deeply concerned by'.

Operative Clauses:
Begin with action verbs in the third person present: 'Calls upon', 'Urges', 'Encourages', 'Requests', 'Recommends'. Operative clauses should be numbered, clear, and implementable.


Amendments

Friendly Amendments:
• Small changes agreed to by the sponsors of a draft resolution.
• With Chairs’ confirmation these are adopted without debate or vote in many MMUN procedures.
 

Unfriendly Amendments:
• Changes which alter or remove clauses without sponsor agreement.
• Must be submitted in writing, declared in order by the Chair, debated, and put to a vote before being incorporated.


Voting Procedure

Substantive votes (e.g., passing a resolution or unfriendly amendment): Simple majority of present and voting delegations unless the committee or conference rules specify otherwise. Abstentions are allowed unless a delegation answered 'Present and Voting' during roll call, in which case abstention is waived. Procedural motions generally require a simple majority.

Voting methods include placard vote (standard) and roll call vote (if requested and granted).


Human Rights Council — Committee-Specific Guidance

• Focus on human-rights-based approaches: centre the dignity, rights, and protection of individuals and groups rather than geopolitical advantage.
• Reference international human rights instruments (e.g., UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR) and relevant treaty bodies or Special Procedures where appropriate.
• Consider vulnerable groups and intersectional impacts when drafting clauses.
• Propose monitoring, capacity-building, reporting mechanisms, and international cooperation rather than punitive unilateral measures which HRC cannot implement alone.


Model Preambulatory Phrases 

• Bearing in mind

• Recognizing with deep concern

• Recalling

• Noting with appreciation

• Deeply concerned by

• Guided by

• Having considered

• Noting further


Model Operative Verbs 

• Calls upon

• Urges

• Encourages

• Requests

• Recommends

• Calls for

• Affirms

• Decides to establish


Tips for Successful Delegation

• Research your delegation’s existing human rights record and publicly stated priorities.
• Build regional and cross-regional coalitions: human rights issues often require broad support.
• Draft realistic, evidence-based operative clauses that can attract co-sponsors.
• Use unmoderated caucuses strategically to write and refine draft resolutions.
• When speaking, be concise, reference legal frameworks, and offer practical implementation steps.


Common Errors to Avoid

• Proposing vague or unenforceable actions.
• Using accusatory or politicized language that alienates potential co-sponsors.
• Submitting late or poorly formatted amendments.
• Confusing procedural points with substantive debate points.


Appendix: Example Motion Language (for Chairs)

• 'I move to open a moderated caucus of 15 minutes with a speaking time of 1 minute per speaker to discuss [sub-topic].'
• 'I move to enter an unmoderated caucus for 20 minutes for the purpose of drafting a resolution on [topic].'
• 'I move to close debate and move to voting procedure on the draft resolution.'

  

Topic 1: Assessing the Viability of Turkey’s Accession to the European Union Amid Economic Instability, Human Rights Concerns, and Political Backsliding


Topic Brief:

Turkey’s efforts to join the European Union (EU) remains a challenge due to political disputes and growing skepticism between both parties.

Despite Turkey being recognized as a candidate for EU membership in 1999, its accession to the European union formally began in 2005 due to concerns regarding human rights violations and tensions between turkey and several EU member states. 

Turkey poses as a strategic ally that connects Europe and Asia, creating strong economic and security ties with the EU parliament. 

However, turkey presents concerning internal and regional challenges, such as economic instability by high inflation and currency depreciation. Additionally, restrictions on freedom of expression and media censorship have deepened doubts about Turkey’s alignment with EU democratic standards.

Moreover, Turkey’s regional conflicts (particularly in Syria and the Eastern Mediterranean) continue amidst energy and immigration challenges.


Main Countries Involved:

1. Turkey: EU candidate country. Poses challenges in democracy, Economy, and violation of Human Rights. 

2. Germany and France:Influential EU members. Cautious towards accession due to Turkey’s regional concerns.

3. Greece and Cyprus:Oppose accession until their maritime and territorial disputes in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean are resolved.

4. Hungary: Favors accession, emphasizing the importance of this strategic partnership and migration control.


Timeline of Events:

1. 1999: Turkey recognized as an official EU candidate. 

2. 2005: Formal accession negotiations begin.

3. 2013–2016: EU raises concerns over freedom of speech and political arrests.

4. 2016: Failed coup attempt leads to emergency rule. EU accession talks effectively freeze.

5. 2018–2023: Turkey economic crisis. Inflation exceeds 60%.

6. 2023: Turkey holds general elections. President Erdogan reelected raising democratic decline concerns.

7. 2024–2025: EU reconsiders regional strategy, emphasizing cooperation on migration, trade, and energy while keeping accession hopes uncertain.


Efficient Resources:

http://europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20250502IPR28215/turkiye-s-eu-accession-process-must-remain-frozen

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/05/07/european-parliament-turkeys-accession-on-hold-no-progress-since-2018

https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/turkey-eu-transactional/



Topic 2: Reassessing the European Union’s 2050 Climate Neutrality Target: Balancing Economic Stability, Energy Security, and Environmental Responsibility


Topic Brief:

The European Union has a commitment to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 under the European Green Deal. 

The aim is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero through sustainable energy practices and economical strategies. 

However, due to emerging geopolitical tensions (Russia-Ukraine conflict) the aftermath energy crisis has exposed vulnerabilities in Europe’s energy security and economic stability. 

The growing concern over affordable green transition and rising energy prices has prompted public speculation about whether EU can meet its 2050 goal without jeopardizing economic competitiveness. 

Some member states advocate for a gradual transition and expand use of nuclear energy, while others demand faster decarbonization and stricter environmental regulations. 

Balancing these competing priorities of climate responsibility, Economic Stability, Energy Security has become a defining challenge for the EU’s long-term strategy.


Main Countries Involved:

1. Germany: Leading in renewable energy. Faces industrial pressure to maintain competitiveness.

2. France: Advocates for nuclear energy as a solution for carbon neutrality.

3. Poland: Dependent on coal. Faces economic costs and social impact of transition.

4. Italy and Spain:Focused on balancing economic growth with renewable energy expansion.

5. Russia: Indirectly affects EU energy strategy through supply disruptions and gas dependency.


Timeline of Events:

1. 2019: European Green Deal, committing to net-zero emissions by 2050.

2. 2020: EU adopts the Climate Law, legally binding the 2050 neutrality target.

3. 2021: COVID-19 recovery plans incorporate green investments.

4. 2022: Russian invasion of Ukraine triggers energy shortages. EU promotes renewable energy deployment.

5. 2023: EU implements the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to regulate imports based on carbon intensity.

6. 2024: Economic struggles and inflation raise concerns about the cost of transition.


Efficient Resources: 

https://epthinktank.eu/2025/06/12/roadmap-to-eu-climate-neutrality-scrutiny-of-member-states/

https://www.greendealnet.eu/EU-carbon-neutral-future-net-zero

https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition#:~:text=To%20keep%20global%20warming%20to,reach%20net%20zero%20by%202050

Copyright © 2025 MMUN - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by GoDaddy

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept